In article <6482b7f1-2904-4d41-804b-8a47d5d3c90d@g31g2000vbr.googlegroups.com>, The alMIGHTY N <natlee75@yahoo.com> wrote:
>On Jan 11, 9:44=A0am, Robert P Holley <holle...@delanet.com> wrote:
>> On Jan 10, 1:56=A0am, "RKRM" <r...@safe-mail.net> wrote:
>>
>> >http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/0...an-with-wor_n_...
>>
>> Speaks volumes about how terrible the Obama economy is, doesn't it?
>
>Let me correct that for you...
>
>"Speaks volumes about how terrible the economy Obama inherited from
>the Republicans is, doesn't it?"
>
>There. That's about right now.
So, um, when does obama start to take ownership of the situation?

"Robert P Holley" <holleyrp@delanet.com> wrote in message
news:fd792989-1c51-4f47-afad-78a5d4692621@q41g2000vba.googlegroups.com...
> On Jan 10, 1:56 am, "RKRM" <r...@safe-mail.net> wrote:
>> http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/0...an-with-wor_n_...
>
> Speaks volumes about how terrible the Obama economy is, doesn't it?

Yea, well when considering your posts from not so long ago about how the 360
was getting well over 8m more in console sales to the PS3, I guess that that
huge PS3 turnaround is the dems fault as well.

On Jan 12, 3:25 pm, Winniethep...@100acrewoods.org (GMAN) wrote:
> In article <6482b7f1-2904-4d41-804b-8a47d5d3c...@g31g2000vbr.googlegroups..com>, The alMIGHTY N <natle...@yahoo.com> wrote:>On Jan 11, 9:44=A0am, Robert P Holley <holle...@delanet.com> wrote:
> >> On Jan 10, 1:56=A0am, "RKRM" <r...@safe-mail.net> wrote:
>
> >> >http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/0...an-with-wor_n_....
>
> >> Speaks volumes about how terrible the Obama economy is, doesn't it?
>
> >Let me correct that for you...
>
> >"Speaks volumes about how terrible the economy Obama inherited from
> >the Republicans is, doesn't it?"
>
> >There. That's about right now.
>
> So, um, when does obama start to take ownership of the situation?

He's doing what he can, as opposed to the Republicans, whose best
answer is to simply say "no" to whatever he wants, with Dick
"Waterboarding's Fun!" Cheney popping out of hiding every so often to
make ridiculous, hypocritical pronouncements.

On Jan 12, 4:22 pm, "Tom" <no...@nothere.com> wrote:
> "Robert P Holley" <holle...@delanet.com> wrote in messagenews:fd792989-1c51-4f47-afad-78a5d4692621@q41g2000vba.googlegroups.com...
>
> > On Jan 10, 1:56 am, "RKRM" <r...@safe-mail.net> wrote:
> >>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/0...an-with-wor_n_....
>
> > Speaks volumes about how terrible the Obama economy is, doesn't it?
>
> Yea, well when considering your posts from not so long ago about how the 360
> was getting well over 8m more in console sales to the PS3, I guess that that
> huge PS3 turnaround is the dems fault as well.

Holley's had that same irrational hatred of Obama that seems so
prevalent among the Tea Party crowd. No, he's not "the Chosen One",
but he's at least trying to do something about the situation.
Meanwhile, it's telling that the TP guys are gravitating towards Sarah
Palin, whose greatest ability is the kind of "appeal to the our basest
instincts" media savvy that reality TV "stars" have. What kind of
politician, who claims to be better in foreign policy than Obama,
doesn't even understand the background of the Korean War and the DMZ?
Apparently Sarah Palin, according to the very person who was her
campaign handler, and picked her as a good alternative to Lieberman.
And that's what they say is the future of the GOP?

GMAN wrote:

>>> Speaks volumes about how terrible the Obama economy is, doesn't it?
>> Let me correct that for you...
>>
>> "Speaks volumes about how terrible the economy Obama inherited from
>> the Republicans is, doesn't it?"
>>
>> There. That's about right now.
> So, um, when does obama start to take ownership of the situation?

He took ownership when he took office, but having ownership is not the same as
being the cause. It took us 10 years to get into this mess, and it will take
more than one year to get out. Calling this "the Obama economy" is nothing more
than mud-slinging because even Republicans are smart enough to know that the
current state of the economy has little to do with Obama's policies. It will be
at least another year or two before the effects of his policies can be evaluated
in any substantial way, just in time for the next election.

"Nick Soapdish, Jr." <JGordon452@aol.com> wrote in message
news:57e1f396-bd59-4b37-a961-58ed2168ac37@a32g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...
> On Jan 12, 4:22 pm, "Tom" <no...@nothere.com> wrote:
>> "Robert P Holley" <holle...@delanet.com> wrote in
>> messagenews:fd792989-1c51-4f47-afad-78a5d4692621@q41g2000vba.googlegroups.com...
>>
>> > On Jan 10, 1:56 am, "RKRM" <r...@safe-mail.net> wrote:
>> >>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/0...an-with-wor_n_...
>>
>> > Speaks volumes about how terrible the Obama economy is, doesn't it?
>>
>> Yea, well when considering your posts from not so long ago about how the
>> 360
>> was getting well over 8m more in console sales to the PS3, I guess that
>> that
>> huge PS3 turnaround is the dems fault as well.
>
> Holley's had that same irrational hatred of Obama that seems so
> prevalent among the Tea Party crowd. No, he's not "the Chosen One",
> but he's at least trying to do something about the situation.
> Meanwhile, it's telling that the TP guys are gravitating towards Sarah
> Palin, whose greatest ability is the kind of "appeal to the our basest
> instincts" media savvy that reality TV "stars" have. What kind of
> politician, who claims to be better in foreign policy than Obama,
> doesn't even understand the background of the Korean War and the DMZ?
> Apparently Sarah Palin, according to the very person who was her
> campaign handler, and picked her as a good alternative to Lieberman.
> And that's what they say is the future of the GOP?

Scary, isn't it?

"Zee" <no_one@nowhere.net> wrote in message
news:1263341928.666863@sj-nntpcache-2.cisco.com...
> GMAN wrote:
>
>>>> Speaks volumes about how terrible the Obama economy is, doesn't it?
>>> Let me correct that for you...
>>>
>>> "Speaks volumes about how terrible the economy Obama inherited from
>>> the Republicans is, doesn't it?"
>>>
>>> There. That's about right now.
>> So, um, when does obama start to take ownership of the situation?
>
> He took ownership when he took office, but having ownership is not the
> same as being the cause. It took us 10 years to get into this mess, and it
> will take more than one year to get out. Calling this "the Obama economy"
> is nothing more than mud-slinging because even Republicans are smart
> enough to know that the current state of the economy has little to do with
> Obama's policies. It will be at least another year or two before the
> effects of his policies can be evaluated in any substantial way, just in
> time for the next election.

Unfortunately, most people do not, or cannot understand the time it takes
policies to take effect, and for the most part, many will follow this as a
deficiency based on the words of the opposition. Oh, I remember when the
pubs had such deficiencies, but their spin machines tended to be more well
oiled than naught and could still buy their ways to an election win. I
somehow think the powers that be will, yet again, buy themselves another
election based on these purported deficiencies.

On Jan 12, 7:40 pm, "Tom" <no...@nothere.com> wrote:
> "Zee" <no_...@nowhere.net> wrote in message
>
> news:1263341928.666863@sj-nntpcache-2.cisco.com...
>
>
>
>
>
> > GMAN wrote:
>
> >>>> Speaks volumes about how terrible the Obama economy is, doesn't it?
> >>> Let me correct that for you...
>
> >>> "Speaks volumes about how terrible the economy Obama inherited from
> >>> the Republicans is, doesn't it?"
>
> >>> There. That's about right now.
> >> So, um, when does obama start to take ownership of the situation?
>
> > He took ownership when he took office, but having ownership is not the
> > same as being the cause. It took us 10 years to get into this mess, andit
> > will take more than one year to get out. Calling this "the Obama economy"
> > is nothing more than mud-slinging because even Republicans are smart
> > enough to know that the current state of the economy has little to do with
> > Obama's policies. It will be at least another year or two before the
> > effects of his policies can be evaluated in any substantial way, just in
> > time for the next election.
>
> Unfortunately, most people do not, or cannot understand the time it takes
> policies to take effect, and for the most part, many will follow this as a
> deficiency based on the words of the opposition. Oh, I remember when the
> pubs had such deficiencies, but their spin machines tended to be more well
> oiled than naught and could still buy their ways to an election win. I
> somehow think the powers that be will, yet again, buy themselves another
> election based on these purported deficiencies.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Great documentary here on the BUSH changes made by the BUSH admin

Naomi Wolf has an interesting insight to say the least

its divx format but its a great watch


http://veehd.com/video/2358433_Ameri...dom-to-Fascism

On Jan 12, 4:25 pm, Winniethep...@100acrewoods.org (GMAN) wrote:
> In article <6482b7f1-2904-4d41-804b-8a47d5d3c...@g31g2000vbr.googlegroups..com>, The alMIGHTY N <natle...@yahoo.com> wrote:>On Jan 11, 9:44=A0am, Robert P Holley <holle...@delanet.com> wrote:
> >> On Jan 10, 1:56=A0am, "RKRM" <r...@safe-mail.net> wrote:
>
> >> >http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/0...an-with-wor_n_....
>
> >> Speaks volumes about how terrible the Obama economy is, doesn't it?
>
> >Let me correct that for you...
>
> >"Speaks volumes about how terrible the economy Obama inherited from
> >the Republicans is, doesn't it?"
>
> >There. That's about right now.
>
> So, um, when does obama start to take ownership of the situation?

According to the liberals...never. lol They never accept
responsibility for any of their failings.

"But he is trying!"

So pathetic and disengenious liberals are (of course that's evident
with their handling of the Harry Reid comments but that's another
topic) when it comes to Obama. Obama has been an utter failure so far.
There is no spinning this. It is FACT.

Imagine being one of the jackasses who voted this failure into office
and driving around with his bumper stick on their car? How
embarrassing.

On Jan 12, 4:25 pm, Winniethep...@100acrewoods.org (GMAN) wrote:
> In article <6482b7f1-2904-4d41-804b-8a47d5d3c...@g31g2000vbr.googlegroups..com>, The alMIGHTY N <natle...@yahoo.com> wrote:>On Jan 11, 9:44=A0am, Robert P Holley <holle...@delanet.com> wrote:
> >> On Jan 10, 1:56=A0am, "RKRM" <r...@safe-mail.net> wrote:
>
> >> >http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/0...an-with-wor_n_....
>
> >> Speaks volumes about how terrible the Obama economy is, doesn't it?
>
> >Let me correct that for you...
>
> >"Speaks volumes about how terrible the economy Obama inherited from
> >the Republicans is, doesn't it?"
>
> >There. That's about right now.
>
> So, um, when does obama start to take ownership of the situation?

Obama has already taken responsibility for the economy not improving,
which is something he absolutely should do. On the other hand, he has
only been in office for ONE year. Anyone trying to vilify him after
just a year for not being able to turn around the incredible mess that
Bush left for him is simply an inane idiot, just like anyone claiming
that this is "the Obama economy" as if he were responsible for causing
it or even being in the driver's seat when it got the way it is is an
inane idiot.

On Jan 13, 9:23 am, Robert P Holley <holle...@delanet.com> wrote:
> On Jan 12, 4:25 pm, Winniethep...@100acrewoods.org (GMAN) wrote:
>
> > In article <6482b7f1-2904-4d41-804b-8a47d5d3c...@g31g2000vbr.googlegroups.com>, The alMIGHTY N <natle...@yahoo.com> wrote:>On Jan 11, 9:44=A0am,Robert P Holley <holle...@delanet.com> wrote:
> > >> On Jan 10, 1:56=A0am, "RKRM" <r...@safe-mail.net> wrote:
>
> > >> >http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/0...an-with-wor_n_...
>
> > >> Speaks volumes about how terrible the Obama economy is, doesn't it?
>
> > >Let me correct that for you...
>
> > >"Speaks volumes about how terrible the economy Obama inherited from
> > >the Republicans is, doesn't it?"
>
> > >There. That's about right now.
>
> > So, um, when does obama start to take ownership of the situation?
>
> According to the liberals...never. lol They never accept
> responsibility for any of their failings.
>
> "But he is trying!"
>
> So pathetic and disengenious liberals are (of course that's evident
> with their handling of the Harry Reid comments but that's another
> topic) when it comes to Obama. Obama has been an utter failure so far.
> There is no spinning this. It is FACT.
>
> Imagine being one of the jackasses who voted this failure into office
> and driving around with his bumper stick on their car? How
> embarrassing.

Give up this Republican fanboy nonsense because all you're doing is
painting yourself as a moron with no faculty for intelligent thought.

Obama has been in office for *ONE* year so there is absolutely no
basis for anyone to claim that he has succeeded or failed at
*anything.* If you really think John McCain or any other Republican
would have been able to ascend to the Presidency and turned around the
mess that the *Republicans* got this country into (both in the Middle
East and at home) then you're even dumber than your statements make
you appear to be.

Then again, it's quite clear that you're simply one of the mindless
drones who spout the party line without taking a moment to generate an
original thought of your own, much like the idiots supporting Obama
simply because he was black or the dumbasses claiming that gay
marriage will ruin the idea of family.

How about you actually put together a valid argument for once instead
of just dealing in your typical mind-numbing zealous nonsense?

On Jan 12, 7:05 pm, "Nick Soapdish, Jr." <JGordon...@aol.com> wrote:
> On Jan 12, 4:22 pm, "Tom" <no...@nothere.com> wrote:
>
> > "Robert P Holley" <holle...@delanet.com> wrote in messagenews:fd792989-1c51-4f47-afad-78a5d4692621@q41g2000vba.googlegroups.com...
>
> > > On Jan 10, 1:56 am, "RKRM" <r...@safe-mail.net> wrote:
> > >>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/0...an-with-wor_n_....
>
> > > Speaks volumes about how terrible the Obama economy is, doesn't it?
>
> > Yea, well when considering your posts from not so long ago about how the 360
> > was getting well over 8m more in console sales to the PS3, I guess thatthat
> > huge PS3 turnaround is the dems fault as well.
>
> Holley's had that same irrational hatred of Obama that seems so
> prevalent among the Tea Party crowd.  No, he's not "the Chosen One",
> but he's at least trying to do something about the situation.
> Meanwhile, it's telling that the TP guys are gravitating towards Sarah
> Palin, whose greatest ability is the kind of "appeal to the our basest
> instincts" media savvy that reality TV "stars" have.  What kind of
> politician, who claims to be better in foreign policy than Obama,
> doesn't even understand the background of the Korean War and the DMZ?
> Apparently Sarah Palin, according to the very person who was her
> campaign handler, and picked her as a good alternative to Lieberman.
> And that's what they say is the future of the GOP?

It's surprisingly refreshing, though, to know that it's not just video
game fans that have to suffer from Jonah Falcon and Blig Merk types.

HAHAHAHAHA!!!! WHAT A FUCKING LOSER!!!!!

Hey, you fucking idiots, even though this will be an exercise in
trying to teach algebra to a pig, here is the difference between me
and Jonah the Joke.

Jonah the Joke is a HUGE xflop fanbitch, in fact, the queer is the
queen of you xflop fanbitches. I FUCKING HATE THE XFLOP 3-SHITTY. Get
the difference, maggot minds?

Here are some more factoids about Jonah the Joke you xflop fanbitches
seem to have missed.

There is NO OFFICIAL LARGEST PENIS RECORD. It is just another self-
promotion gimmick concocted by the biggest douche in the world. There
are lots of other guys now with bigger dicks and it is acknowledged it
is not possible establish an official length due to various extension
enhancements.

Here is another one for you fucking faggots finding comfort a big dick
is one of your own. Ever notice Jonah the Joke keeps talking about the
length but it never gets hard? What would it be like to supposedly
have the biggest dick but be impotent? Even on the George Takei bit,
it never got hard. There is the most obvious reason for not being able
to make it in pr0n -- you have to be able to get it hard on demand.

As for pr0n, old Jonah the Joke has admitted in several places it is
bi, and more fag than bi. And it likes butt thumping dudes most.

Another infobit for you. Falcon is not his last name. If you notice,
Jonah the Joke is a bastard, legally as well as in personality. He
took on the last name Falcon and was asked by the Falcon family to
cease and desist its use. He fought it and kept the right to use it as
a last name.

Of fuck, this piece of work is so fucked up, it isn't even worth going
into anymore. But of course, it is a huge xflop fanbitch. Figures. Add
it to the short list of fucking distorted examples of pseudo-humans
that make up alt.games.video.xbox.Strange, all the deviants the xflop
has drawn over the years.

Blig Merk wrote:
> HAHAHAHAHA!!!! WHAT A FUCKING LOSER!!!!!
>
> Hey, you fucking idiots, even though this will be an exercise in
> trying to teach algebra to a pig, here is the difference between me
> and Jonah the Joke.
>
> Jonah the Joke is a HUGE xflop fanbitch, in fact, the queer is the
> queen of you xflop fanbitches. I FUCKING HATE THE XFLOP 3-SHITTY. Get
> the difference, maggot minds?
>
> Here are some more factoids about Jonah the Joke you xflop fanbitches
> seem to have missed.
>
> There is NO OFFICIAL LARGEST PENIS RECORD. It is just another self-
> promotion gimmick concocted by the biggest douche in the world. There
> are lots of other guys now with bigger dicks and it is acknowledged it
> is not possible establish an official length due to various extension
> enhancements.
>
> Here is another one for you fucking faggots finding comfort a big dick
> is one of your own. Ever notice Jonah the Joke keeps talking about the
> length but it never gets hard? What would it be like to supposedly
> have the biggest dick but be impotent? Even on the George Takei bit,
> it never got hard. There is the most obvious reason for not being able
> to make it in pr0n -- you have to be able to get it hard on demand.
>
> As for pr0n, old Jonah the Joke has admitted in several places it is
> bi, and more fag than bi. And it likes butt thumping dudes most.
>
> Another infobit for you. Falcon is not his last name. If you notice,
> Jonah the Joke is a bastard, legally as well as in personality. He
> took on the last name Falcon and was asked by the Falcon family to
> cease and desist its use. He fought it and kept the right to use it as
> a last name.
>
> Of fuck, this piece of work is so fucked up, it isn't even worth going
> into anymore. But of course, it is a huge xflop fanbitch. Figures. Add
> it to the short list of fucking distorted examples of pseudo-humans
> that make up alt.games.video.xbox.Strange, all the deviants the xflop
> has drawn over the years.

Wow, Looks like the thought of getting your ass plugged by Mister Talkin
Yankmees has gotten you all excited.

On Jan 13, 11:16 am, Blig Merk <blig_m...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> HAHAHAHAHA!!!! WHAT A FUCKING LOSER!!!!!
>
> Hey, you fucking idiots, even though this will be an exercise in
> trying to teach algebra to a pig, here is the difference between me
> and Jonah the Joke.
>
> Jonah the Joke is a HUGE xflop fanbitch, in fact, the queer is the
> queen of you xflop fanbitches. I FUCKING HATE THE XFLOP 3-SHITTY. Get
> the difference, maggot minds?

Boy howdy, it looks like the moron has made his way back to the
newsgroup to point out the obvious. I, for one, am glad since
alt.games.video.xbox just isn't the same without the blathering
nonsense of a halfwit malcontent to shake things up.

And I suppose there's the real difference between the two of you -
Jonah's just a halfwit.

But you're both the shining examples of the most pitiful, pathetic,
sad little sacks of shit that call themselves gaming fans - the
console fanboys.

> Here are some more factoids about Jonah the Joke you xflop fanbitches
> seem to have missed.
>
> There is NO OFFICIAL LARGEST PENIS RECORD. It is just another self-
> promotion gimmick concocted by the biggest douche in the world. There
> are lots of other guys now with bigger dicks and it is acknowledged it
> is not possible establish an official length due to various extension
> enhancements.

What's really sad is how you, in your delirious rambling, missed out
on how the fact that you took the time to research this makes you look
even more pathetic a dumbass than you already looked.

> Here is another one for you fucking faggots finding comfort a big dick
> is one of your own. Ever notice Jonah the Joke keeps talking about the
> length but it never gets hard? What would it be like to supposedly
> have the biggest dick but be impotent? Even on the George Takei bit,
> it never got hard. There is the most obvious reason for not being able
> to make it in pr0n -- you have to be able to get it hard on demand.

Again, your mouth keeps spouting off this verbal diarrhea and you
don't even recognize that you're simply proving all the theories we
ever had about you. Well, I, for one, am always glad to help two star
crossed souls finally find happiness in each other's arms. I'll take
your word on Jonah's holdbacks and send out my prayers that together
the two of you can work out his inadequacies in the comfort of your
mothers' basements.

> As for pr0n, old Jonah the Joke has admitted in several places it is
> bi, and more fag than bi. And it likes butt thumping dudes most.

Well, *someone* loves the sound of his own voice. Redundant much?

> Another infobit for you. Falcon is not his last name. If you notice,
> Jonah the Joke is a bastard, legally as well as in personality. He
> took on the last name Falcon and was asked by the Falcon family to
> cease and desist its use. He fought it and kept the right to use it as
> a last name.

Man, what a moron. Do you really believe that any family would have
the right to prevent someone from taking the same last name? Anyone
has the legal right to change their name - first, last or both - to
just about anything. No court in the country would even agree to hear
something like this, let alone waste taxpayers' money on such idiocy.

Nice try, though, dumbass.

> Of fuck, this piece of work is so fucked up, it isn't even worth going
> into anymore. But of course, it is a huge xflop fanbitch. Figures. Add
> it to the short list of fucking distorted examples of pseudo-humans
> that make up alt.games.video.xbox.Strange, all the deviants the xflop
> has drawn over the years.

You mean like you and Jonah?

On Jan 13, 12:52 pm, The alMIGHTY N <natle...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> What's really sad is how you, in your delirious rambling, missed out
> on how the fact that you took the time to research this makes you look
> even more pathetic a dumbass than you already looked.

That's what I find funny too. Out of all the video gaming news, game
releases, industry developments, etc...Bliggy is awoken from
hibernation due to the subject of Jonah's penis??

The fact it was this subject that prompted him to ask his mother for
permission to use the computer shows how secretly fascinated he is
with Jonah.

> I'll take
> your word on Jonah's holdbacks and send out my prayers that together
> the two of you can work out his inadequacies in the comfort of your
> mothers' basements.

Seriously, the two of them might could put differences aside and do a
few shoots together as their debut into the porn industry. Finally he
could bash 360 owners and say he knows how it feels to have a RROD
since Blig taking Jonah from behind would definitely result in Blig
having a RROD in the butt area.

>
> Man, what a moron. Do you really believe that any family would have
> the right to prevent someone from taking the same last name?

Perhaps his own family?

On Jan 13, 2:54 pm, Tomcat <tom_overton_1...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Jan 13, 12:52 pm, The alMIGHTY N <natle...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > What's really sad is how you, in your delirious rambling, missed out
> > on how the fact that you took the time to research this makes you look
> > even more pathetic a dumbass than you already looked.
>
> That's what I find funny too. Out of all the video gaming news, game
> releases, industry developments, etc...Bliggy is awoken from
> hibernation due to the subject of Jonah's penis??

It's really quite simple, though, when you think about it: there
hasn't been any reason for a blinders-on Sony fanboy like Blig to come
in here spouting off about how superior the PlayStation 3 is. He was
probably sitting at his computer, fingers hovering over the keyboard,
waiting all new year for some indication that the PS3 had demolished
the 360 over the holidays, drooling like some slobbering fool, only to
be devastated when news broke that the two performed so similarly that
it was difficult for anyone to even agree on predictions of which
console would come out on top of the other.

What else is he going to bluster on about?

> The fact it was this subject that prompted him to ask his mother for
> permission to use the computer shows how secretly fascinated he is
> with Jonah.
>
> > I'll take
> > your word on Jonah's holdbacks and send out my prayers that together
> > the two of you can work out his inadequacies in the comfort of your
> > mothers' basements.
>
> Seriously, the two of them might could put differences aside and do a
> few shoots together as their debut into the porn industry. Finally he
> could bash 360 owners and say he knows how it feels to have a RROD
> since Blig taking Jonah from behind would definitely result in Blig
> having a RROD in the butt area.

I just vomited in my mouth.

"Stick your PS3 wand in my RROD, big boy. Now eject your software into
my hard drive."

> > Man, what a moron. Do you really believe that any family would have
> > the right to prevent someone from taking the same last name?
>
> Perhaps his own family?

On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 07:17:30 -0800 (PST), The alMIGHTY N
<natlee75@yahoo.com> wrote:

>On Jan 11, 8:47 pm, Tomcat <tom_overton_1...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> On Jan 11, 7:14 pm, Hank the Rapper <xflopg...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> > Men in porn do not make a lot of money, unless they are willing to do
>> > gay porn.
>>
>> Well, Blig Merk and Jonah both need jobs...
>
>ROFL

You know I from the first time I saw this story my reaction has been
"this is all made up". It's all just absurd the way it touches nearly
every stereotypical geek loser touchstone. "40 year old man,
unmarried and apparently unattached, unemployed, lives at home in
mom's basement, constantly spams, and is an unrivaled fanboy of a
giant corporation. But has giant dong."

COME ON.

On Jan 13, 5:30 pm, Trevor Smithson <trevor_smith...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 07:17:30 -0800 (PST), The alMIGHTY N
>
> <natle...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >On Jan 11, 8:47 pm, Tomcat <tom_overton_1...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> On Jan 11, 7:14 pm, Hank the Rapper <xflopg...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >> > Men in porn do not make a lot of money, unless they are willing to do
> >> > gay porn.
>
> >> Well, Blig Merk and Jonah both need jobs...
>
> >ROFL
>
> You know I from the first time I saw this story my reaction has been
> "this is all made up".  It's all just absurd the way it touches nearly
> every stereotypical geek loser touchstone.  "40 year old man,
> unmarried and apparently unattached, unemployed, lives at home in
> mom's basement, constantly spams, and is an unrivaled fanboy of a
> giant corporation.  But has giant dong."
>
> COME ON.

Well, there's a reason a behavior or attribute becomes a stereotype...

Trevor Smithson wrote:

> You know I from the first time I saw this story my reaction has been
> "this is all made up". It's all just absurd the way it touches nearly
> every stereotypical geek loser touchstone. "40 year old man,
> unmarried and apparently unattached, unemployed, lives at home in
> mom's basement, constantly spams, and is an unrivaled fanboy of a
> giant corporation. But has giant dong."
>
> COME ON.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jonah_Falcon

On Jan 13, 8:23 am, Robert P Holley <holle...@delanet.com> wrote:
> On Jan 12, 4:25 pm, Winniethep...@100acrewoods.org (GMAN) wrote:
>
> > In article <6482b7f1-2904-4d41-804b-8a47d5d3c...@g31g2000vbr.googlegroups.com>, The alMIGHTY N <natle...@yahoo.com> wrote:>On Jan 11, 9:44=A0am,Robert P Holley <holle...@delanet.com> wrote:
> > >> On Jan 10, 1:56=A0am, "RKRM" <r...@safe-mail.net> wrote:
>
> > >> >http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/0...an-with-wor_n_...
>
> > >> Speaks volumes about how terrible the Obama economy is, doesn't it?
>
> > >Let me correct that for you...
>
> > >"Speaks volumes about how terrible the economy Obama inherited from
> > >the Republicans is, doesn't it?"
>
> > >There. That's about right now.
>
> > So, um, when does obama start to take ownership of the situation?
>
> According to the liberals...never. lol They never accept
> responsibility for any of their failings.
>
> "But he is trying!"
>
> So pathetic and disengenious liberals are (of course that's evident
> with their handling of the Harry Reid comments but that's another
> topic) when it comes to Obama. Obama has been an utter failure so far.
> There is no spinning this. It is FACT.
>
> Imagine being one of the jackasses who voted this failure into office
> and driving around with his bumper stick on their car? How
> embarrassing.

Well, you've just lost whatever credibility and reputation you may
have ONCE had as a reasonable person, with your little Glenn Beck-
inspired, venomous rant. It's telling that the best you can do is
point to Harry Reid, while history proves your whole point of view as
WRONG. It was Bush's complete and unmeasured embrace of laissez-faire
economics that led to the bubble exploding, as no one was doing any
kind of regulatory oversight on how the very institutions that impact
our retirement funds were investing. Fiscal responsibility? This is
the guy who shipped plane-loads of money out of the country to Iraq,
so they could be lost in a vortex of crooked contracting and grey-
market unaccountability, which, coincidentally, involved significant
amounts of money going to Bush/Cheney buddies Halliburton and
Blackwater. But you won't address that, instead using the old "look,
it's the Goodyear Blimp" diversionary tactics. It may have worked for
Bill and Ted in the Old West, but we ain't quite that gullible here,
what with our horseless carriage-filled modern society. The Tea Party
yahoos, as usual, are all sound and fury, signifying nothing. Obama,
in his first year, has put forth far more personal effort than George
"weeks long vacations while Al Qaeda bones up on flying lessons" Bush
in multiple years. Perfect? No, far from it, but Obama's at least
doing the best a man can in this situation......but that doesn't
matter to you. Hell, all that matters to you is feelin' like a big
man standin' up to those liberal pussies, 'cause that's what a REAL
man does, right? If you say all the right things, maybe the guys with
the Big Money (tm) will give you the secret password, and let you
become one of them. Get real- political dogmatism is for either the
intellectually lazy, or those who will directly benefit from it.

So until you can actually address anything the rest of us have said,
please.....just shut the f@#$ up and sit down.

On Jan 13, 12:46 pm, Swifty <thedeci...@undecided.gov> wrote:
> Blig Merk wrote:
> > HAHAHAHAHA!!!! WHAT A FUCKING LOSER!!!!!
>
> > Hey, you fucking idiots, even though this will be an exercise in
> > trying to teach algebra to a pig, here is the difference between me
> > and Jonah the Joke.
>
> > Jonah the Joke is a HUGE xflop fanbitch, in fact, the queer is the
> > queen of you xflop fanbitches. I FUCKING HATE THE XFLOP 3-SHITTY. Get
> > the difference, maggot minds?
>
> > Here are some more factoids about Jonah the Joke you xflop fanbitches
> > seem to have missed.
>
> > There is NO OFFICIAL LARGEST PENIS RECORD. It is just another self-
> > promotion gimmick concocted by the biggest douche in the world. There
> > are lots of other guys now with bigger dicks and it is acknowledged it
> > is not possible establish an official length due to various extension
> > enhancements.
>
> > Here is another one for you fucking faggots finding comfort a big dick
> > is one of your own. Ever notice Jonah the Joke keeps talking about the
> > length but it never gets hard? What would it be like to supposedly
> > have the biggest dick but be impotent? Even on the George Takei bit,
> > it never got hard. There is the most obvious reason for not being able
> > to make it in pr0n -- you have to be able to get it hard on demand.
>
> > As for pr0n, old Jonah the Joke has admitted in several places it is
> > bi, and more fag than bi. And it likes butt thumping dudes most.
>
> > Another infobit for you. Falcon is not his last name. If you notice,
> > Jonah the Joke is a bastard, legally as well as in personality. He
> > took on the last name Falcon and was asked by the Falcon family to
> > cease and desist its use. He fought it and kept the right to use it as
> > a last name.
>
> > Of fuck, this piece of work is so fucked up, it isn't even worth going
> > into anymore. But of course, it is a huge xflop fanbitch. Figures. Add
> > it to the short list of fucking distorted examples of pseudo-humans
> > that make up alt.games.video.xbox.Strange, all the deviants the xflop
> > has drawn over the years.
>
> Wow, Looks like the thought of getting your ass plugged by Mister Talkin
> Yankmees has gotten you all excited.

Pay no attention to bilgemerk. This stupid asshole perkoff throws its
immature spamtrums because of all the coal Santa left in its stocking
(while it's still wearing them, what a perkoff.)

On Jan 13, 8:22 pm, "Nick Soapdish, Jr." <JGordon...@aol.com> wrote:
> On Jan 13, 8:23 am, Robert P Holley <holle...@delanet.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jan 12, 4:25 pm, Winniethep...@100acrewoods.org (GMAN) wrote:
>
> > > In article <6482b7f1-2904-4d41-804b-8a47d5d3c...@g31g2000vbr.googlegroups.com>, The alMIGHTY N <natle...@yahoo.com> wrote:>On Jan 11, 9:44=A0am, Robert P Holley <holle...@delanet.com> wrote:
> > > >> On Jan 10, 1:56=A0am, "RKRM" <r...@safe-mail.net> wrote:
>
> > > >> >http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/0...an-with-wor_n_...
>
> > > >> Speaks volumes about how terrible the Obama economy is, doesn't it?
>
> > > >Let me correct that for you...
>
> > > >"Speaks volumes about how terrible the economy Obama inherited from
> > > >the Republicans is, doesn't it?"
>
> > > >There. That's about right now.
>
> > > So, um, when does obama start to take ownership of the situation?
>
> > According to the liberals...never. lol They never accept
> > responsibility for any of their failings.
>
> > "But he is trying!"
>
> > So pathetic and disengenious liberals are (of course that's evident
> > with their handling of the Harry Reid comments but that's another
> > topic) when it comes to Obama. Obama has been an utter failure so far.
> > There is no spinning this. It is FACT.
>
> > Imagine being one of the jackasses who voted this failure into office
> > and driving around with his bumper stick on their car? How
> > embarrassing.
>
> Well, you've just lost whatever credibility and reputation you may
> have ONCE had as a reasonable person, with your little Glenn Beck-
> inspired, venomous rant.  It's telling that the best you can do is
> point to Harry Reid, while history proves your whole point of view as
> WRONG.  It was Bush's complete and unmeasured embrace of laissez-faire
> economics that led to the bubble exploding, as no one was doing any
> kind of regulatory oversight on how the very institutions that impact
> our retirement funds were investing.  Fiscal responsibility?  This is
> the guy who shipped plane-loads of money out of the country to Iraq,
> so they could be lost in a vortex of crooked contracting and grey-
> market unaccountability, which, coincidentally, involved significant
> amounts of money going to Bush/Cheney buddies Halliburton and
> Blackwater.  But you won't address that, instead using the old "look,
> it's the Goodyear Blimp" diversionary tactics.  It may have worked for
> Bill and Ted in the Old West, but we ain't quite that gullible here,
> what with our horseless carriage-filled modern society.  The Tea Party
> yahoos, as usual, are all sound and fury, signifying nothing.  Obama,
> in his first year, has put forth far more personal effort than George
> "weeks long vacations while Al Qaeda bones up on flying lessons" Bush
> in multiple years.  Perfect?  No, far from it, but Obama's at least
> doing the best a man can in this situation......but that doesn't
> matter to you.  Hell, all that matters to you is feelin' like a big
> man standin' up to those liberal pussies, 'cause that's what a REAL
> man does, right?  If you say all the right things, maybe the guys with
> the Big Money (tm) will give you the secret password, and let you
> become one of them.  Get real- political dogmatism is for either the
> intellectually lazy, or those who will directly benefit from it.
>
> So until you can actually address anything the rest of us have said,
> please.....just shut the f@#$ up and sit down.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

I can't believe this nonsensical article turned into a political
debate. I even more so can't believe "ANYONE" would point at Obama and
say HE is to blame. Are you F#CKING KIDDING ME!?

Political zealots are the worst. Worse than any gaming fanboy,
religious zealot or even any racist.
They are the worst!

This is why I have nothing to do with my in-laws. They are both
religious and political zealots. It's the biggest waste of time there
is to argue either of the two. People are ususally too blind to see
the truth or spin myths and opinions into facts (<- like ALL zealots
do!).

On Jan 13, 6:35 pm, Zee <no_...@nowhere.net> wrote:
> Trevor Smithson wrote:
> > You know I from the first time I saw this story my reaction has been
> > "this is all made up".  It's all just absurd the way it touches nearly
> > every stereotypical geek loser touchstone.  "40 year old man,
> > unmarried and apparently unattached, unemployed, lives at home in
> > mom's basement, constantly spams, and is an unrivaled fanboy of a
> > giant corporation.  But has giant dong."
>
> > COME ON.
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jonah_Falcon

I could have sworn that video said he was in his 40s...

On Jan 14, 1:20 pm, The alMIGHTY N <natle...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Jan 13, 6:35 pm, Zee <no_...@nowhere.net> wrote:
>
> > Trevor Smithson wrote:
> > > You know I from the first time I saw this story my reaction has been
> > > "this is all made up".  It's all just absurd the way it touches nearly
> > > every stereotypical geek loser touchstone.  "40 year old man,
> > > unmarried and apparently unattached, unemployed, lives at home in
> > > mom's basement, constantly spams, and is an unrivaled fanboy of a
> > > giant corporation.  But has giant dong."
>
> > > COME ON.
>
> >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jonah_Falcon
>
> I could have sworn that video said he was in his 40s...

The fact that he has a wiki page is sad enough.

Zee wrote:
> Trevor Smithson wrote:
>
>> You know I from the first time I saw this story my reaction has been
>> "this is all made up". It's all just absurd the way it touches nearly
>> every stereotypical geek loser touchstone. "40 year old man,
>> unmarried and apparently unattached, unemployed, lives at home in
>> mom's basement, constantly spams, and is an unrivaled fanboy of a
>> giant corporation. But has giant dong."
>>
>> COME ON.
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jonah_Falcon

I like the section on "Acting" credits where it basically lists him
being use as an extra. He's an "actor" in the same way that he's a
"journalist". :-)

Morgan wrote:
>
> I like the section on "Acting" credits where it basically lists him
> being use as an extra. He's an "actor" in the same way that he's a
> "journalist". :-)

Exactly. I feel bad for the guy, because his genetic deformity is all
he has going for him. Did you see the picture he posed for? 60 pounds
overweight, and he poses almost nude. What do you think they paid him?
A hundred bucks...if that?

Jonah, just do the porn. Nobody takes you seriously now. George Takai
(or however you spell it) said you had bad breath and told you that you
needed to work out. Wow. That "massive cock" (Your words) has brought
you such happiness.

Why not do what the rest of us (without "massive cocks") do?
GET SOME EDUCATION!

NOBODY who is unemployed right now should NOT be furthering their education.

To live with your mother, and be fat enough to show the world you aren't
wanting for food, and not be pursuing something marketable besides
actor, "video game journalist" (OMG..40 years old!).

Stop being a loser and a drain on society. Find a skill or craft and do
something. And don't make a documentary about it.

Jeez give Jonah a break he's a human being like the rest of us

I've had my moments where I wanna throw people off a bridge but in the
end we're all the same man.

Peace be with you

What's worse spewing venom and hatred or casting a light of love,I'm
going with love man ,always side with love.

On Jan 15, 8:13 am, Robert P Holley <holle...@delanet.com> wrote:
> On Jan 13, 8:22 pm, "Nick Soapdish, Jr." <JGordon...@aol.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jan 13, 8:23 am, Robert P Holley <holle...@delanet.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Jan 12, 4:25 pm, Winniethep...@100acrewoods.org (GMAN) wrote:
>
> > > > In article <6482b7f1-2904-4d41-804b-8a47d5d3c...@g31g2000vbr.googlegroups.com>, The alMIGHTY N <natle...@yahoo.com> wrote:>On Jan 11, 9:44=A0am, Robert P Holley <holle...@delanet.com> wrote:
> > > > >> On Jan 10, 1:56=A0am, "RKRM" <r...@safe-mail.net> wrote:
>
> > > > >> >http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/0...an-with-wor_n_...
>
> > > > >> Speaks volumes about how terrible the Obama economy is, doesn't it?
>
> > > > >Let me correct that for you...
>
> > > > >"Speaks volumes about how terrible the economy Obama inherited from
> > > > >the Republicans is, doesn't it?"
>
> > > > >There. That's about right now.
>
> > > > So, um, when does obama start to take ownership of the situation?
>
> > > According to the liberals...never. lol They never accept
> > > responsibility for any of their failings.
>
> > > "But he is trying!"
>
> > > So pathetic and disengenious liberals are (of course that's evident
> > > with their handling of the Harry Reid comments but that's another
> > > topic) when it comes to Obama. Obama has been an utter failure so far..
> > > There is no spinning this. It is FACT.
>
> > > Imagine being one of the jackasses who voted this failure into office
> > > and driving around with his bumper stick on their car? How
> > > embarrassing.
>
> > Well, you've just lost whatever credibility and reputation you may
> > have ONCE had as a reasonable person, with your little Glenn Beck-
> > inspired, venomous rant.  It's telling that the best you can do is
> > point to Harry Reid, while history proves your whole point of view as
> > WRONG.  It was Bush's complete and unmeasured embrace of laissez-faire
> > economics that led to the bubble exploding, as no one was doing any
> > kind of regulatory oversight on how the very institutions that impact
> > our retirement funds were investing.  Fiscal responsibility?  This is
> > the guy who shipped plane-loads of money out of the country to Iraq,
> > so they could be lost in a vortex of crooked contracting and grey-
> > market unaccountability, which, coincidentally, involved significant
> > amounts of money going to Bush/Cheney buddies Halliburton and
> > Blackwater.  But you won't address that, instead using the old "look,
> > it's the Goodyear Blimp" diversionary tactics.  It may have worked for
> > Bill and Ted in the Old West, but we ain't quite that gullible here,
> > what with our horseless carriage-filled modern society.  The Tea Party
> > yahoos, as usual, are all sound and fury, signifying nothing.  Obama,
> > in his first year, has put forth far more personal effort than George
> > "weeks long vacations while Al Qaeda bones up on flying lessons" Bush
> > in multiple years.  Perfect?  No, far from it, but Obama's at least
> > doing the best a man can in this situation......but that doesn't
> > matter to you.  Hell, all that matters to you is feelin' like a big
> > man standin' up to those liberal pussies, 'cause that's what a REAL
> > man does, right?  If you say all the right things, maybe the guys with
> > the Big Money (tm) will give you the secret password, and let you
> > become one of them.  Get real- political dogmatism is for either the
> > intellectually lazy, or those who will directly benefit from it.
>
> > So until you can actually address anything the rest of us have said,
> > please.....just shut the f@#$ up and sit down.- Hide quoted text -
>
> Let me guess...you're one of those losers with an Obama bumper sticker
> on your car, aren't you? lol
>
> I'm sorry if I struck a nerve with you but don't take it so personal.
> Just because you voted for an inexperienced,

You mean like Bush, McCain and Palin? At least Bush and Palin had been
executives of *something* but we all know how one got his position and
how the other one worked out... couldn't even finish the term.

> racist,

I definitely see that with all the white people on his staff.

> community
> organizer

And there's something wrong with being a community organizer?

> who has fast-tracked this country into socialized medicine,

You're just drinking up the conservative Kool-Aid, aren't you? You
probably should actually read the health bills before you actually
open that trap of yours.

> double digit unemployment

Well, that's thanks to Bush and the Republicans so let's just stop
that nonsense right there.

> and 4X deficits

Again, thanks to Bush and the Republicans so you've only got your butt
buddies to blame there.

> doesn't mean you're to
> blame. It just mean's you were clueless, like most liberals.

It's ironic that you of all people would call someone else clueless as
you've shown quite the knack for that during this whole thread. In
only one instance, mentioned above, have you come even close to
dabbling in reality.

Nice try, though. Come back when you actually have some accurate
information.

On Jan 15, 8:15 am, Robert P Holley <holle...@delanet.com> wrote:
> On Jan 13, 11:16 am, Blig Merk <blig_m...@yahoo.com> screamed:
>
> > I FUCKING HATE THE XFLOP 3-SHITTY.
>
> Say it again but with more passion this time.

The master teaching student, as it should be.